The Bee Sting by Paul Murray
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
View all my reviews
As a college professor and writer, I'm reading all the time, sometimes so much that I forget what I've read. Two years ago, I challenged myself to use Goodreads and Audible to record my reactions. There are enough of those now that I thought I'd post them to this blog so that anyone interested could browse through them.
Wednesday, July 31, 2024
Wednesday, July 24, 2024
Monday, July 22, 2024
Friday, July 19, 2024
Review: Moon Grammar
Moon Grammar by Matthew Porto
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
I can’t be too objective, about what I think of this book because I am so proud simply to be holding it. Matt was my student several years ago, and it is one of those rewarding moments as a teacher to see how much he has grown and how much he has achieved.
That said, this is a beautiful book, one that meditates carefully on a sweeping set of images and concerns.
We open with the beautiful piece “The Angel Speaks” in which an angel, one unusual for its interest in the doings of humankind, makes us a promise. Instead of blinding us with overwhelming light, it promises us that we must “get used to the light.”
That notion is just one of the themes that runs throughout this fine collection. The first poem in the third section, Endings, called “Ultimate Thule,” talks not of an angel, but of a friend who has swum out to a buoy in the water. As the last line goes, “the last I saw of you, a handful of light.”
Those two poems in dialogue offer a fast-paced overview of the arc of the collection. We move from the perspective of angels meditating on Jacob and Rachel meeting over the well and falling in love. Then Matt explores that image in three or four different poems, conjuring a moment that’s both distant in time and immediate in its intimacy.
From there, we get a series of poems that deal increasingly with archaeological experiences, whether in Ithaca or in medieval England. We are no longer quite from the vantage of Angels, but rather of humans whose experiences are just outside something we can come to know.
As such, the book has a beautiful sweep, a sense of moving from the heavenly through the historical, and finally to a sense of Matt’s personal experiences.
I also have a handful of favorite poems throughout this. Of course, I cannot help but appreciate “Our Eden.” We are told below the title that it is set Scranton, and Matt imagines his college days as Edenic. In the shadow of the perspective of the angels, that seems almost funny, but it’s not a lighthearted poem. It’s a young man looking back at a moment that seemed as if it would last forever, being in love with someone in a dumpy college apartment. In that light, graduation is a kind of departure from Eden.
As I said at the start, it’s deeply satisfying to see how far he has come even as he imagines himself still in that same dumpy apartment in the Hill neighborhood off of campus.
I also really love “From Her Diary: Venice.” Matt talks of visiting Venice with a girlfriend and, among other things, looking for the grave of Ezra Pound. He says at the end of the poem, having found the grave and moving on:
“It is sinking,/ we always hear in the news, forever sinking into the Earth,/ but from our low view on the water,/ it rose and rose until it covered the sky.”
And then, in the final poem, “Epigone: The Latecomer,” we get these concluding lines:
“some light, it’s true, makes it to us, but always/ refractory, errant, struggling to deign downward”
Beautiful stuff, stuff to make me proud and to make me think.
View all my reviews
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
I can’t be too objective, about what I think of this book because I am so proud simply to be holding it. Matt was my student several years ago, and it is one of those rewarding moments as a teacher to see how much he has grown and how much he has achieved.
That said, this is a beautiful book, one that meditates carefully on a sweeping set of images and concerns.
We open with the beautiful piece “The Angel Speaks” in which an angel, one unusual for its interest in the doings of humankind, makes us a promise. Instead of blinding us with overwhelming light, it promises us that we must “get used to the light.”
That notion is just one of the themes that runs throughout this fine collection. The first poem in the third section, Endings, called “Ultimate Thule,” talks not of an angel, but of a friend who has swum out to a buoy in the water. As the last line goes, “the last I saw of you, a handful of light.”
Those two poems in dialogue offer a fast-paced overview of the arc of the collection. We move from the perspective of angels meditating on Jacob and Rachel meeting over the well and falling in love. Then Matt explores that image in three or four different poems, conjuring a moment that’s both distant in time and immediate in its intimacy.
From there, we get a series of poems that deal increasingly with archaeological experiences, whether in Ithaca or in medieval England. We are no longer quite from the vantage of Angels, but rather of humans whose experiences are just outside something we can come to know.
As such, the book has a beautiful sweep, a sense of moving from the heavenly through the historical, and finally to a sense of Matt’s personal experiences.
I also have a handful of favorite poems throughout this. Of course, I cannot help but appreciate “Our Eden.” We are told below the title that it is set Scranton, and Matt imagines his college days as Edenic. In the shadow of the perspective of the angels, that seems almost funny, but it’s not a lighthearted poem. It’s a young man looking back at a moment that seemed as if it would last forever, being in love with someone in a dumpy college apartment. In that light, graduation is a kind of departure from Eden.
As I said at the start, it’s deeply satisfying to see how far he has come even as he imagines himself still in that same dumpy apartment in the Hill neighborhood off of campus.
I also really love “From Her Diary: Venice.” Matt talks of visiting Venice with a girlfriend and, among other things, looking for the grave of Ezra Pound. He says at the end of the poem, having found the grave and moving on:
“It is sinking,/ we always hear in the news, forever sinking into the Earth,/ but from our low view on the water,/ it rose and rose until it covered the sky.”
And then, in the final poem, “Epigone: The Latecomer,” we get these concluding lines:
“some light, it’s true, makes it to us, but always/ refractory, errant, struggling to deign downward”
Beautiful stuff, stuff to make me proud and to make me think.
View all my reviews
Thursday, July 18, 2024
Wednesday, July 17, 2024
Review: The Sirens of Titan
The Sirens of Titan by Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
New review:
I am very much in my Vonnegut phase as I prepare for a senior seminar all about him.
I should say more accurately, that it’s all about only five of his novels – Slaughterhouse Five and the four novels that precede it. I’ve said it more carefully elsewhere (and often), but I see Vonnegut as essentially writing one novel, a novel centrally concerned with the trauma of his war-time experiences at Dresden. That is, each of these novels bleed together into what I call a ‘meta-novel.’ Or, in my more creative moments, I call it Slaughterhouses One through Five.
In any event, as I return to this from a few years away and look for evidence to support my thesis, I want to say: this is the same novel as Slaughterhouse, just not as well written and not as concentrated in its recognition that it’s dealing with trauma.
In other words, this is a novel about a man – Malachi Constant, aka Unk, aka the Space Wanderer – who’s supposed to be part of an invasion but who spends the battle sheltered from disaster underground. (view spoiler)[That is, Unk is in a cave on Mercury when the humans of Mars make their designed-to-fail attack on Earth. (hide spoiler)] Like Vonnegut at Dresden, he is both part of the attacking army and part of the people who are being attacked.
What’s more, just as Billy Pilgrim is ‘unstuck in time’ – by the creatures of Trafalmadore, who are central to this novel – Winston Niles Rumfoord is similarly caught up in a loop that has him experience everything in his life as if it’s part of the same moment.
In my reading of this, we see the outline of the novel that will become Slaughterhouse Five. The same questions are here – a victim doesn’t know how to tell the story of his trauma and that trauma expresses itself in part by a perpetual present, a perpetual inability to move beyond the moment of that trauma.
All of that squares with the lens of trauma theory in literary studies that I am working with, so it’s all very reassuring of my central thesis.
Maybe I won’t persuade people to read Vonnegut in the way I propose, but I do hope I can persuade at least some to keep reading his stuff. The later novels tend to bore me – worse, they disappoint me so much that they make me question how good these early novels are. Starting with this, though, and moving through the next four, I think Vonnegut accomplished something powerful, something worth preserving.
If you believe me, start here. Keep going because it gets even better – next to the others, this is cluttered and unsure of its way – but this is funny and humane in ways that only Vonnegut could be.
---------------Original review, Sept. 27, 2017--------------
I had a Vonnegut phase in high school and into my early college years, and I remain grateful to him for showing me that literature can make you think even as it makes you laugh. I loved him for four or five years, then I felt I’d outgrown him. It’s only in the last four or five years (leaving a good 25 in between) that I’ve come back to him in a more measured way.
I think the best Vonnegut really is as good as his partisans say, as good as I thought it was when I first encountered it in the Reagan years. God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater, Slaughterhouse Five, and, of course, Cat’s Cradle are all substantial works that hold up. They take elements of science fiction, combine them with a cynicism that can only be the product of an even deeper idealism, and give us some of the most memorable critiques of American life from the last 50 years.
Sirens of Titan isn’t quite up to that level. It’s Vonnegut feeling his way toward his more successful work. He senses there’s an intellectual freedom in a science fiction mode, but he gets mildly trapped in it here. The idea, for instance, of Rumfoord as a cosmic intelligence capable of seeing past and future is an intriguing spin on the idea of a god, but it also becomes a bit self-defeating. Rumfoord moves the events of Constant’s life forward, but it isn’t clear why. He seems to want to teach humanity a lesson – and Constant’s conclusion that our purpose is to love another isn’t a bad distillation, even if it sounds trite in my paraphrase. In the end, though, he himself is confused and moving on. It’s solid and intriguing, moving in some ways, but it also implies an anxiety from the still-learning Vonnegut.
Much of what is striking in the novel gets refined in later ones. We have, for instance, the rudiments of a religion that comes across more impressively in Cat’s Cradle. We also have a riff on the use of impediments to arrive at true equality; an idea he does a lot more with in “Harrison Bergeron” and that feels tacked on here. And we have disaffected rich men, unsure how to account for their great fortune, who get crystallized in Eliot Rosewater.
The one great contribution here, I think, is the Tralfamadorans. Yes, they come back in Slaughterhouse Five, but they’re here in fully realized form. It’s a brilliant idea: life forms so different from ours who direct humans toward great accomplishments that serve as trivial ‘text messages’ from across the universe. What is the Great Wall of China but, in effect, a post it note from the inter-stellar UPS driver saying he’ll be back soon with the package.
Definitely read this one. It’s not a bad place to start with Vonnegut if you know you’ll go on, and it’s a great way to echo the pleasures of the more mature novels if you’ve read them. Either way, commit to reading other Vonnegut as well. As striking as this is, it’s only a glimpse at what was to come.
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
New review:
I am very much in my Vonnegut phase as I prepare for a senior seminar all about him.
I should say more accurately, that it’s all about only five of his novels – Slaughterhouse Five and the four novels that precede it. I’ve said it more carefully elsewhere (and often), but I see Vonnegut as essentially writing one novel, a novel centrally concerned with the trauma of his war-time experiences at Dresden. That is, each of these novels bleed together into what I call a ‘meta-novel.’ Or, in my more creative moments, I call it Slaughterhouses One through Five.
In any event, as I return to this from a few years away and look for evidence to support my thesis, I want to say: this is the same novel as Slaughterhouse, just not as well written and not as concentrated in its recognition that it’s dealing with trauma.
In other words, this is a novel about a man – Malachi Constant, aka Unk, aka the Space Wanderer – who’s supposed to be part of an invasion but who spends the battle sheltered from disaster underground. (view spoiler)[That is, Unk is in a cave on Mercury when the humans of Mars make their designed-to-fail attack on Earth. (hide spoiler)] Like Vonnegut at Dresden, he is both part of the attacking army and part of the people who are being attacked.
What’s more, just as Billy Pilgrim is ‘unstuck in time’ – by the creatures of Trafalmadore, who are central to this novel – Winston Niles Rumfoord is similarly caught up in a loop that has him experience everything in his life as if it’s part of the same moment.
In my reading of this, we see the outline of the novel that will become Slaughterhouse Five. The same questions are here – a victim doesn’t know how to tell the story of his trauma and that trauma expresses itself in part by a perpetual present, a perpetual inability to move beyond the moment of that trauma.
All of that squares with the lens of trauma theory in literary studies that I am working with, so it’s all very reassuring of my central thesis.
Maybe I won’t persuade people to read Vonnegut in the way I propose, but I do hope I can persuade at least some to keep reading his stuff. The later novels tend to bore me – worse, they disappoint me so much that they make me question how good these early novels are. Starting with this, though, and moving through the next four, I think Vonnegut accomplished something powerful, something worth preserving.
If you believe me, start here. Keep going because it gets even better – next to the others, this is cluttered and unsure of its way – but this is funny and humane in ways that only Vonnegut could be.
---------------Original review, Sept. 27, 2017--------------
I had a Vonnegut phase in high school and into my early college years, and I remain grateful to him for showing me that literature can make you think even as it makes you laugh. I loved him for four or five years, then I felt I’d outgrown him. It’s only in the last four or five years (leaving a good 25 in between) that I’ve come back to him in a more measured way.
I think the best Vonnegut really is as good as his partisans say, as good as I thought it was when I first encountered it in the Reagan years. God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater, Slaughterhouse Five, and, of course, Cat’s Cradle are all substantial works that hold up. They take elements of science fiction, combine them with a cynicism that can only be the product of an even deeper idealism, and give us some of the most memorable critiques of American life from the last 50 years.
Sirens of Titan isn’t quite up to that level. It’s Vonnegut feeling his way toward his more successful work. He senses there’s an intellectual freedom in a science fiction mode, but he gets mildly trapped in it here. The idea, for instance, of Rumfoord as a cosmic intelligence capable of seeing past and future is an intriguing spin on the idea of a god, but it also becomes a bit self-defeating. Rumfoord moves the events of Constant’s life forward, but it isn’t clear why. He seems to want to teach humanity a lesson – and Constant’s conclusion that our purpose is to love another isn’t a bad distillation, even if it sounds trite in my paraphrase. In the end, though, he himself is confused and moving on. It’s solid and intriguing, moving in some ways, but it also implies an anxiety from the still-learning Vonnegut.
Much of what is striking in the novel gets refined in later ones. We have, for instance, the rudiments of a religion that comes across more impressively in Cat’s Cradle. We also have a riff on the use of impediments to arrive at true equality; an idea he does a lot more with in “Harrison Bergeron” and that feels tacked on here. And we have disaffected rich men, unsure how to account for their great fortune, who get crystallized in Eliot Rosewater.
The one great contribution here, I think, is the Tralfamadorans. Yes, they come back in Slaughterhouse Five, but they’re here in fully realized form. It’s a brilliant idea: life forms so different from ours who direct humans toward great accomplishments that serve as trivial ‘text messages’ from across the universe. What is the Great Wall of China but, in effect, a post it note from the inter-stellar UPS driver saying he’ll be back soon with the package.
Definitely read this one. It’s not a bad place to start with Vonnegut if you know you’ll go on, and it’s a great way to echo the pleasures of the more mature novels if you’ve read them. Either way, commit to reading other Vonnegut as well. As striking as this is, it’s only a glimpse at what was to come.
View all my reviews
Tuesday, July 16, 2024
Wednesday, July 10, 2024
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)